President
Donald Trump
acknowledged earlier this month that the ”
homegrowns are next.
Now he declined to rule out the chance that U.S. citizens might be mistakenly deported.
Deeply embroiled in disputes surrounding his latest directives to expel green card holders and initiate deportations,
immigrants
Without proper legal procedures, the president seemed to admit guilt during an interview with
The Atlantic
that unintentional deportations of U.S. citizens are not unthinkable.
When asked about the possibility of his administration accidentally removing the wrong individual or an American citizen, Trump responded to the magazine saying, “Let me assure you that perfection cannot always be achieved in this world.”
Trump’s comment about the “homegrowns” was made to El Salvador President
Nayib Bukele
, has declined to assist in returning Salvadoran father Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the United States despite admitting that his deportation to a harsh mega-prison resulted from an “administrative” error. The Trump administration has further asserted that Abrego Garcia is part of the MS-13 gang and continues to stand firm on this position.
Will never set foot on US soil again.
When asked whether he worried about deporting the incorrect individuals, the president stated, “You know, I’m not part of those processes. I have numerous teams handling these matters.” He continued, “These groups are incredibly strict and pose significant threats; this much is certain. Remember, too, that they entered the nation unlawfully.”
The president’s comments follow recent criticisms from several federal judges regarding his administration’s failure to provide adequate due process when deporting immigrants.
As late as Saturday, a
district judge
In Louisiana, they stated that a two-year-old U.S. citizen seems to have been deported.
Honduras
with“no meaningful process.”
In the meantime, the administration has initiated deportation processes for certain individuals.
green card holders
including a Columbia graduate student and activist
Mahmoud Khalil,
Who claims he facilitated talks between the school and pro-Palestinian demonstrators last year? The Trump administration has designated him.“pro-Hamas.”
Following a ruling this month
Khalil might face deportation.
His legal representative stated that her client “endured a mockery of due process, a blatant infringement of his right to a fair trial, and the misuse of immigration laws as a tool to stifle dissent.”
A federal judge in Washington, D.C., determined that there was sufficient evidence to justify holding the Trump administration accountable.
disrespect towards the law by disregarding judicial instructions
To send back aircraft transporting purported Venezuelan gang members who were expelled to a harsh El Salvadorian supermax prison utilizing the 1798 wartime legislation called the Alien Enemies Act. “I find the judge awful,” Trump commented.
The Atlantic.
A few weeks prior, the Supreme Court addressed the matter of whether the Trump administration was permitted to utilize the statute for deportation purposes. Justice Sonia Sotomayor took part in this decision.
wrote
In her dissent, she argued that the government had deported “dozens” of Venezuelans to a foreign prison “without proper legal proceedings, under the authority of the Alien Enemies Act—a statute from 1798 intended for wartime scenarios.”
A split court permitted the administration to keep utilizing the ancient statute for deporting immigrants as the legal challenge proceeds, though the majority noted that those being deported should also be considered.
entitled to notification and a chance to contest their removal.
Last week, Trump additionally commented that allowing due process would be too time-consuming and expressed that his administration ought to possess the power to expel immigrants without conducting trials.
We’re removing them, and a judge cannot insist, ‘No, they must undergo a trial,'” Trump stated at the White House last week. “A trial would drag on for about two years. Our nation could become quite perilous if we aren’t permitted to act as we are rightfully entitled.
The previous day, he shared on his Truth Social profile: “It’s not possible to provide every individual with a hearing, as doing so would realistically require 200 years.”
The Independent has consistently maintained a worldwide viewpoint. Rooted in robust international journalism and insightful analysis, The Independent has expanded its influence far beyond what could have been imagined when it initially emerged as a challenger in Britain’s media landscape. In the post-World War II era, for the first time globally, principles like pluralism, rationality, progressivism, humanitarian concerns, and international cooperation—the core tenets upheld by The Independent—are facing challenges. Nonetheless, The Independent keeps expanding its presence.